Trump insists that he once dicked over dictator Gaddafi by overcharging him rent on a piece of land in New York where the brutal leader had planned to pitch a Bedouin-style tent over his newly purchased Sleepnumber Bed™.
Trump claimed he collected more of Muammar’s money for one night than New Yorkers would pay for two years to rent the nearly postage-stamp sized lot ($600,000) and then didn’t even let him camp out.
Trump stated, "That's what we should be doing. I don't want to use the word 'screwed', but I screwed him. That's what we should be doing."
Is making comments publicly about cheating someone, even if they are evil, a legitimate way to attract voters? Unsolicited Drivel asked our political analyst for comment about the Donald’s tale of deception and he told us:
“I’m a little shocked that someone whose success is built on robbing Peter to pay Paul would consider himself a presidential contender to begin with. Anyway, after being sold lie after lie during the Bush administration and being sold ‘change’ by Obama which isn’t happening soon enough for progressives who deluded themselves into thinking the current president was truly liberal, I don’t think presenting oneself as a lying cheat is the way to go to win many votes. Even though Republicans are known for lying, it’s never been used openly, with no apologies as a campaign tactic before. However, Trump’s use of the word ‘screw’ does present some possibility to gain votes with those Americans more comfortable with the notion of him having sex with Gaddafi than with a supermodel, as hotness-wise, let's just say Trump’s looks are much more equally matched to the brutal dictator's and life is unfair enough to begin with.”
0 comments so far :
Post a Comment